For decades, owning a car was a social marker. Today, usage and freedom of movement replace possession. Analysis of a profound cultural shift.
For decades, owning a car was a social marker. Today, usage, sobriety, and freedom of movement replace possession. Analysis of a profound cultural shift. A few years ago, when I was running a company of about fifty people, the question of company cars came up regularly. It was a sensitive topic, almost emotional. Managers awaited their company car like a rite of passage. Senior executives negotiated the brand and range with the same intensity they would have put into a salary increase. The car was not a means of transportation. It was a symbol. A validation. A visible recognition of their place in the organization. I remember a sales director who had refused a promotion because it did not come with a higher category vehicle. For him, accepting the position without the corresponding car would have been a social regression. He preferred to stay where he was, with his Audi A4, rather than take on more responsibility with a Volkswagen Passat. The logic seemed absurd to me at first. Then I understood: it was not about transport. It was about identity. That era is not so distant. And yet, it now seems to belong to another world. When the Car Was a Social Totem For nearly a century, the car embodied an ideal of freedom, power, and personal achievement. Owning a car meant breaking free from geographical constraints, demonstrating one's ability to acquire an expensive asset, displaying a form of mastery over one's existence. In the 1950s and 1960s, the automobile was the natural…